Skip to main content

Helixgate

Skip to main content

Helixgate

Uncategorized

MHRA to offer early review of non-animal data  

Published

on

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) will offer early review of non-animal data in a decision supporting the government’s strategy to reduce animal testing in drug development.  

The move is intended to help drug developers make greater use of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), hopefully giving developers more confidence when making marketing applications based on evidence generated without animal testing. 

Though each application will still be assessed on a case-by-case basis, the new guidance does include general regulatory principles, including:   

  • Generic/biosimilar products or drugs that are not pharmacologically active in animals should not be tested on animals. 
  • Toxicity testing of biological products on animals should only be done in species shown to be pharmacologically relevant. 
  • Products with a well-recognised pharmacological profile may enter UK clinical trials without having first been tested on animals. 
  • Products with a novel pharmacological action should be tested on animals, in line with international guidelines. 
  • Products that cannot be tested for efficacy in clinical trials, such as vaccines for some emerging pandemic infectious diseases, should be tested on animals. 

To support the use of NAMs, the MHRA will review preliminary data from drug trials that use non-animal models. By the end of 2026, companies with a product developed without animal testing can have Module 4 of their Marketing Authorisation application reviewed by the MHRA in advance. 

In this scheme, companies will submit Module 4, the Investigator Brochure and the final report of at least one clinical trial. The MHRA will give a non-binding written opinion that accepts the adequacy of the data or explains deficiencies.  This will be included in the Marketing Authorisation application, alongside the Module 4 previously submitted and any updated version. The MHRA will undertake a further review, in consultation with the Commission on Human Medicines, and either endorse or reject the application, with reasons for any rejection. Companies submitting Module 4 in advance will be charged a fee to recover administrative costs and discourage unsuitable applications.  

Julian Beach, Interim Executive Director Healthcare Quality and Access said: “A clearer regulatory route for medicines developed without animal testing will help accelerate the transition to modern, predictive science and support the Government’s strategy to reduce and ultimately replace animals in research. 

“Advances such as AI driven analysis and human derived cell models mean some medicines no longer require animal studies to demonstrate safety and efficacy.  

Our offer to review study data ahead of a full marketing application is designed to help researchers who are adopting these approaches build the robust evidence needed to demonstrate safety and efficacy.” 

 

 

The post MHRA to offer early review of non-animal data   appeared first on Drug Discovery World (DDW).

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

BioNTech picks Sobi CEO Oelkers to lead as founders plot new mRNA biotech

Published

on

BioNTech’s leadership transition was announced earlier this year, with CEO Ugur Sahin and CMO Özlem Türeci leaving to start a new mRNA company. Guido Oelkers of Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB will take over as CEO in early 2027.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

STAT+: Sandoz to pay $478.5 million to settle price-fixing allegations in long-running battle with states

Sandoz agreed to pay $478.5 million to settle allegations by dozens of states and resellers of medicines that the company engaged in a widespread conspiracy to artificially inflate and manipulate prices of generic drugs and harmed consumers by reducing competition.

Under one settlement, the company agreed to pay $400 million over seven years starting in 2027 to resolve all remaining claims by U.S. states in three pending cases and make an additional payment of about $50 million to states that settled earlier. Another $28.5 million will be paid to resolve all remaining class-action litigation brought by indirect resellers. Sandoz did not admit to any wrongdoing.

The agreement marks the latest settlement in a long-running battle between numerous states and many of the largest players in the generic drug industry, which were accused of fixing prices for their medicines. Previously, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Lannett, Bausch, Apotex, and Heritage Pharmaceuticals collectively settled lawsuits for nearly $98 million.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Read More

Published

on

Sandoz agreed to pay $478.5 million to settle allegations by dozens of states and resellers of medicines that the company engaged in a widespread conspiracy to artificially inflate and manipulate prices of generic drugs and harmed consumers by reducing competition.

Under one settlement, the company agreed to pay $400 million over seven years starting in 2027 to resolve all remaining claims by U.S. states in three pending cases and make an additional payment of about $50 million to states that settled earlier. Another $28.5 million will be paid to resolve all remaining class-action litigation brought by indirect resellers. Sandoz did not admit to any wrongdoing.

The agreement marks the latest settlement in a long-running battle between numerous states and many of the largest players in the generic drug industry, which were accused of fixing prices for their medicines. Previously, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Lannett, Bausch, Apotex, and Heritage Pharmaceuticals collectively settled lawsuits for nearly $98 million.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Novo’s late-stage IL-6 stumble shakes inflammation space

Published

on

Novo Nordisk was banking on the inflammatory benefits of its investigational therapy ziltivekimab to improve cardiovascular outcomes. Last week’s Phase 3 failure dashed not just the Danish pharma’s hopes but that of other drugmakers working on the same pathway.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending