Helixgate

Helixgate

Uncategorized

AI Model Predicts Cancer Treatment Response from Tumor Genotype

Published

on

Researchers at University of California, San Diego have developed a new artificial intelligence (AI) model that can translate a tumor’s complex genetic profile into predictions about how that cancer may respond to treatment. The foundation model, called MutationProjector, was trained on genomic data from more than 30,000 tumors across 10 solid cancer types, and validated through testing across multiple independent patient cohorts. Led by Trey Ideker, PhD, professor of medicine at UC San Diego School of Medicine and director of the Big Data Institute at the University of Oxford, the researchers say the model offers a new framework for connecting cancer mutations to the biological pathways that drive treatment response.

“Genetic sequencing is already routine in cancer care, but we still struggle to fully interpret the many mutations found in a patient’s tumor,” said Ideker, who also holds a second appointment at UC San Diego Jacobs School of Engineering and is a member of UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center. “Our goal with MutationProjector was to build a general-purpose model that can learn from tens of thousands of tumor genomes and turn those mutation patterns into more precise predictions about treatment response.”

Ideker is co-senior and co-corresponding author of the team’s published paper in Cancer Discovery, titled “A foundation model of cancer genotype enables precise predictions of therapeutic response,” in which the authors stated, “These results establish a unifying framework for connecting tumor genotypes to biological mechanisms and therapeutic outcomes.”

Following a cancer diagnosis, one of the next steps is often genetic testing, which helps doctors classify the tumor and decide which treatments to pursue. “DNA sequencing panels—and in particular those that broadly identify alterations in cancer-associated genes—have been widely adopted in the clinic due to their relatively low cost, rapid turnaround, and established relevance to treatment outcomes,” the authors explained.

Trey Ideker is a professor of medicine at UC San Diego School of Medicine and director of the Big Data Institute at the University of Oxford. [Erik Jepsen / UC San Diego]
Trey Ideker is a professor of medicine at UC San Diego School of Medicine and director of the Big Data Institute at the University of Oxford. [Erik Jepsen / UC San Diego]

However, while genetic testing is relatively low cost, fast, and has a strong track record in cases where validated genetic biomarkers are available, those cases remain limited, because this type of treatment stratification is currently based on only a small number of known biomarkers. Today, only about 8% of cases are successfully matched to an FDA-approved therapy on the basis of genetics and usually on the basis of a single gene, the team continued. “While this situation may reflect the incomplete scope of genes covered by current sequencing panels, it clearly also reflects a fundamental lack of knowledge about how gene mutations should be interpreted.”

They suggest that an “average” tumor has approximately 11 distinct genetic alterations identified by clinical sequencing, representing a potentially rich source of molecular information, if this information could be used to help select treatment. One of the challenges to matching cancer mutations with treatment outcomes is that most mutations are rare, the investigators pointed out. Another is that individual biomarkers do not function in isolation, but act together to influence drug response.

Unlike existing approaches that rely on a small number of biomarkers, MutationProjector analyzes the broader combination of genetic alterations present in a tumor. The model then uses this information to generate a compact representation of the tumor’s biological state, helping researchers interpret which molecular pathways may be disrupted and, by extension, which treatments may be most effective. “Foundation models, which are pre-trained on large datasets and then applied to solve diverse new challenges with relatively few samples, are especially well positioned to advance precision oncology,” Ideker and team noted.

The investigators trained their foundational model, MutationProjector, using genetic profile data from more than 30,000 tumors samples across different cancer types. They then showed that across several independent cohorts of cancer patients, including those with bladder cancer, lung cancer and melanoma, MutationProjector matched or exceeded existing methods for predicting response to common immunotherapy and chemotherapy treatments. The model also identified both known and unexpected biomarkers associated with treatment outcomes, which could help improve current approaches to genetic testing and patient stratification.

“When applied to predict immunotherapy or chemotherapy resistance across multiple cancer types and cohorts, MutationProjector achieves or exceeds state-of-the-art performance in all contexts,” the team wrote. “It identifies unexpected biomarkers, including KMT2D mutation in immunotherapy sensitivity and joint alteration of SMARCA4 and STK11 in immunotherapy resistance.”

JungHo Kong, PhD, first author of the study and a postdoctoral researcher in the department of medicine at UC San Diego School of Medicine, said, “Many cancer mutations are individually rare, which makes them difficult to study one at a time. By pretraining on a large collection of tumors and integrating molecular network knowledge, MutationProjector can detect patterns that would be easy to miss with conventional biomarker approaches. That gives us a way to move from long lists of mutations toward a more functional understanding of the tumor.”

First study author JungHo Kong, shown here, is a postdoctoral researcher at UC San Diego School of Medicine. [UC San Diego Health Sciences]
First study author JungHo Kong, shown here, is a postdoctoral researcher at UC San Diego School of Medicine. [UC San Diego Health Sciences]

The researchers emphasize that the model was designed not only to make predictions, but also to provide insight into why those predictions are made, which could help when refining biomarkers and treatment strategies. This interpretability is especially important in precision oncology, where clinicians need to understand how tumor genotypes relate to treatment decisions.

The team also hopes to expand the model to additional cancer types and data sources, including international cancer genome datasets and other forms of clinical information, such as imaging, transcriptomics, and electronic health records. “While 30,000+ genomes representing 10 solid tumor types were considered in our study, numerous additional tumor samples are available for expansion of MutationProjector to tumor types such as pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer or sarcomas,” the authors said. “Other future studies should explore the extent to which the MutationProject concept can be applied to further clinical tasks of interest, including application to liquid biopsies of circulating tumor DNAs for early cancer detection.”

Ideker added, “Our results suggest that tumor genome foundation models may help extend the clinical value of sequencing beyond a handful of well-known genes. This could support a more comprehensive and biologically grounded approach to precision oncology.”

The post AI Model Predicts Cancer Treatment Response from Tumor Genotype appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

STAT+: At hospital finance conference, a call to end the friction that’s keeping costs high

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — At this week’s annual meeting of hospital finance leaders, the exhibit hall was packed with dozens of billing and collections companies. Armed with candy, tote bags, and pens, they smiled at passersby, eager to explain why their tactics would extract the most money from health insurers. 

The sheer number of “revenue cycle” vendors who attended the Healthcare Financial Management Association’s annual conference in Maryland — outnumbering even the hospital attendees, according to a list shared by an organizer — was a visible reminder of the enormous industry built around just paying medical bills. 

The U.S. health care industry spends roughly $200 billion annually on financial transactions: claims processing, payment, collections, and prior authorization. And yet the proliferation of billing vendors seemed to clash with the main theme of HFMA’s conference, affordability, spotlighting the need to simplify the billing process so that health care is less costly and more accessible for patients. 

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Read More

Published

on

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — At this week’s annual meeting of hospital finance leaders, the exhibit hall was packed with dozens of billing and collections companies. Armed with candy, tote bags, and pens, they smiled at passersby, eager to explain why their tactics would extract the most money from health insurers. 

The sheer number of “revenue cycle” vendors who attended the Healthcare Financial Management Association’s annual conference in Maryland — outnumbering even the hospital attendees, according to a list shared by an organizer — was a visible reminder of the enormous industry built around just paying medical bills. 

The U.S. health care industry spends roughly $200 billion annually on financial transactions: claims processing, payment, collections, and prior authorization. And yet the proliferation of billing vendors seemed to clash with the main theme of HFMA’s conference, affordability, spotlighting the need to simplify the billing process so that health care is less costly and more accessible for patients. 

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Beyond sunshine: Iberia’s biotech moment has arrived with developing capital networks

Published

on

Strong science, lower costs and growing capital networks are putting Spain and Portugal on the biotech investment map, even as structural bottlenecks persist, according to two investors.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Laser‑Driven Phase Contrast Enhances Cryo‑EM Resolution of Small Proteins

Published

on

You know when you are at the eye doctor getting an updated prescription, and suddenly the world snaps into sharper focus? Physicists at the University of California (UC), Berkeley, have now done something similar for electron microscopy. By introducing phase contrast into a cryo‑electron microscope, they have delivered dramatically sharper images of some of biology’s smallest and most elusive proteins.

The advance comes from a new laser phase plate (LPP), described in the paper “Laser phase plate improves structure determination of small proteins by cryo‑EM,” which was published recently in Science. Led by physicist Holger Mueller, PhD, of UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the team demonstrated that a laser‑driven phase plate can overcome one of cryo‑EM’s most persistent limitations: poor contrast for small proteins.

Cryo-EM images of two proteins, apoferritin and hemoglobin, taken without and with a laser phase plate. The images are analyzed in a computer to produce detailed 3D structures of the proteins. [Holger Müller, Jessie Zhang/UC Berkeley]

Cryo‑EM has transformed structural biology over the past decade, earning a Nobel Prize in 2017 for enabling high‑resolution structures without crystallization. But despite its impact, the technique still struggles with proteins below ~70 kilodaltons—a size range that includes about 90% of the human proteome. “Because of signal-to-noise limitations, the majority of human and animal proteins are too small to be analyzed by these methods [cryo-EM and cryoelectron tomography]. The increase in signal-to-noise ratio provided by this laser phase plate is expected to overcome these important limitations.”

The new LPP begins to address that problem. The LPP uses an intense, continuous‑wave laser to shift the phase of the electron beam itself. This produces true phase contrast without dimming or destabilizing the beam. Mueller described the laser focus as “75 kilowatts focused to a few microns… That’s more powerful than what you use for welding. It has more power than a military laser. It builds up the brightest continuous laser focus ever.”

Installed in a custom Thermo Fisher Titan Krios, the LPP immediately improved the clarity and resolvability of small proteins, including hemoglobin, which sits at the lower limit of what today’s cryo‑EM instruments can handle. As the authors wrote in the abstract: “Here, we show that the laser phase plate (LPP)… enhances the resolution in single-particle reconstruction of small proteins by improving specimen-motion correction, recovery of information from the early frames, as well as particle visualization, 3D classification, and alignment.”

phase plate cover Cryo-EM
A laser (purple) is powerfully amplified by highly polished mirrors and focused on the electron beam (blue) to shift its phase and increase the cryo-EM microscope’s contrast, allowing biologists to image smaller proteins and the crowded structures inside cells. [Sayo Studio]

These improvements were achieved using standard defocus ranges and reconstruction workflows. “For the most challenging cases—small particles, bad specimens—the laser produces a very considerable advantage,” Mueller said.

 

The impact extends beyond single‑particle analysis. Cryo‑electron tomography (cryo‑ET), which assembles multiple angular views of a molecule or protein into a three-dimensional image, stands to benefit even more. “With cryo-ET, we’re looking at small, very complicated cellular material that’s incredibly crowded inside the cell,” said Bridget Carragher, PhD, founding technical director of imaging at Biohub. “It’s like a forest of trees, and you’re trying to find one leaf on one tree in there. Cryo-ET needs a dramatic step forward in contrast, so we can start to see what’s going on inside the cell. That’s what the laser phase plate promises to give us.”

Biohub is developing a dual‑laser version of the system, designed to reduce component wear and minimize aberrations. Meanwhile, Mueller’s team is pushing toward imaging proteins as small as 17 kilodaltons, a threshold that would open access to vast regions of the human proteome previously invisible to cryo‑EM.

“This technology is a step function change for biology,” said Stephani Otte, PhD, Biohub’s vice president of imaging science. “What was once invisible will become visible—and that changes everything about how we understand disease.”

“The bottom line is, if you have a large protein and a really good sample—a fresh one or one frozen without bubbles, for example—you may not need the phase plate to get a single, high-quality image. But for a small protein and a bad sample, laser-on is best,” Mueller said. “This could fill an enormous gap in our knowledge of protein structures that can’t be crystallized or are too small for today’s cryo-EM. And it will be revolutionary for cryo-ET.”

The post Laser‑Driven Phase Contrast Enhances Cryo‑EM Resolution of Small Proteins appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending