Helixgate

Helixgate

Uncategorized

STAT+: NIH would get $5 billion cut under Trump’s 2027 budget, but Congress unlikely to go along

Published

on

The White House is asking Congress to cut $5 billion from the National Institutes of Health and to downsize the number of its institutes and centers from 27 to 22 — a plan that is expected to receive a chilly reception from lawmakers from both parties. 

The president’s fiscal year 2027 budget request, released Friday, asks for $41 billion for the NIH and eliminates the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, the Fogarty International Center, and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. The 2027 budget also proposes consolidating two institutes focused on research on drug and alcohol abuse into a new entity called the National Institute of Substance Use and Addiction Research, as well as relocating the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences into the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

The White House proposal also asks Congress to slash the budget for the Advanced Research Projects (ARPA-H), which funds cutting-edge science, from its current $1.5 billion to $945 million.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

BioNTech to shutter Singapore HQ after ‘comprehensive review’   

Published

on

BioNTech, in a move to streamline its operations, is set to close its factory in Singapore that it bought from Novartis just over three years ago.

The facility at the Tuas Biomedical Park, which employs …

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

STAT+: Merck’s experimental HIV prevention pill could be made for less than $5 a year, researchers say

An experimental HIV prevention pill being developed by Merck could be mass produced for less than $5 per patient a year according to a new analysis. Advocates argue the low cost means the company should find it easier to license the drug so that low- and middle-income countries can gain easy access.

The pill, dubbed MK 8527, is currently undergoing a pair of late-stage clinical trials that are expected to determine whether the medicine can lower HIV transmission when given to people at high risk of infection. The results are due in the latter half of 2027, according to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Already, the pill is generating considerable interest after Merck released mid-stage results last summer showing its drug holds promise. In addition to being safe and effective, the study found it could protect against infection, a form of prevention known as pre-exposure prophylaxis or PrEP, within 24 hours after being taken. Merck noted the pill works in a novel way.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Read More

Published

on

An experimental HIV prevention pill being developed by Merck could be mass produced for less than $5 per patient a year according to a new analysis. Advocates argue the low cost means the company should find it easier to license the drug so that low- and middle-income countries can gain easy access.

The pill, dubbed MK 8527, is currently undergoing a pair of late-stage clinical trials that are expected to determine whether the medicine can lower HIV transmission when given to people at high risk of infection. The results are due in the latter half of 2027, according to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Already, the pill is generating considerable interest after Merck released mid-stage results last summer showing its drug holds promise. In addition to being safe and effective, the study found it could protect against infection, a form of prevention known as pre-exposure prophylaxis or PrEP, within 24 hours after being taken. Merck noted the pill works in a novel way.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Opinion: STAT+: Former Geisinger CEO: U.S. health systems must replace huge numbers of people with AI 

About 20 years ago, I stepped on stage at one of our Geisinger town halls and looked out upon a sea of people: thousands of full-time employees at an integrated health system charged with the health and well-being of millions of Pennsylvanians. 

Only a fraction of the people in that room were clinicians. 

That was the first time I fully visualized the problem: We employed more people in our revenue cycle department to process bills and reconcile data than we did doctors. And we weren’t alone. It’s the same story at every health system in America, large and small, and over the past two decades, the ratio has become dramatically more disparate. 

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Read More

Published

on

About 20 years ago, I stepped on stage at one of our Geisinger town halls and looked out upon a sea of people: thousands of full-time employees at an integrated health system charged with the health and well-being of millions of Pennsylvanians. 

Only a fraction of the people in that room were clinicians. 

That was the first time I fully visualized the problem: We employed more people in our revenue cycle department to process bills and reconcile data than we did doctors. And we weren’t alone. It’s the same story at every health system in America, large and small, and over the past two decades, the ratio has become dramatically more disparate. 

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Read More

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending